I'm with Joel Simon on things like this. In a world with people that absurd, what the hell use is satire any more? The fine folks at The Onion simply must be tempted just to hang it up...
I figure that the square flapjack is safer because the corners are a broad 90 degrees as opposed to the sharper 60 degree point on the triangle. But really? why not just pour the batter on the griddle and make 'em round? who makes cornered flapjacks, anyway?
Shiva facepalm: when something is so blatantly stupid, the facepalm requires the six hands of Shiva.
ReplyDeleteSo they go from three points to four. Good Lord...
ReplyDeleteI'm with Joel Simon on things like this. In a world with people that absurd, what the hell use is satire any more? The fine folks at The Onion simply must be tempted just to hang it up...
ReplyDeleteDidn't anybody notice that a square or rectangle has 4 corners verses the 3 corners on the triangle?
ReplyDeleteWouldn't that make the triangle flapjack "safer."
I figure that the square flapjack is safer because the corners are a broad 90 degrees as opposed to the sharper 60 degree point on the triangle. But really? why not just pour the batter on the griddle and make 'em round? who makes cornered flapjacks, anyway?
ReplyDeleteNinja flapjacks. Who'd a thunk it?