Monday, March 25, 2013

Objectively Worse

"Objectively, it might have made things worse" if the Jews who fought the Nazis in the 1943 Warsaw ghetto uprising in Poland had more and better guns, said historian Steve Paulsson, an expert on the period whose Jewish family survived the city's destruction. [More]
Steve is only alive because American men with guns liberated his mother from Auschwitz. I have no words of contempt strong enough for Steve or his co-genocide enablers at the ADL.

They're objectively worse than Holocaust deniers.

[Via Dave Licht] 

1 comment:

  1. Yes, and there's a clown masquerading as a professor in the UK who claims Hitler "loosened" gun laws. I have a copy of JPFO's fine "Gateway to Tyranny" with the German laws in the original. It is true that most were enacted during the Weimar years before Hitler came to power. He really didn't need to do anything but create a class of prohibited persons, namely Jews. As for Nazi party members, after Jan. 1933, they surely had little difficulty in obtaining small arms, but that does not qualify as "loosening" the laws any more than Hollywood celebrities obtaining concealed carry permits means that Los Angeles County has relaxed its criteria for same. If I were Bloomberg's friend or business partner, I'm sure a NYC carry permit would be granted with a minimum of fuss; that does not mean that Bloomberg has "loosened" the city's gun laws.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.