Contact Us [More]Well, since they asked, by all means, do.
Paste this link into their form, along with the message:
Sorry, but as long as Coloradans allow their government to attack the Second Amendment, your businesses will not see one dime from me. Get control of your unruly servants and we'll talk.
I think it would make more of an impact if you also included this contact information. If you agree, copy and paste it into the form, too:
136 State Capitol
Denver
80203-1792
(303) 866-2471
As always, I never ask anything of you that I won't do myself:
UPDATE: Dave Workman weighs in on this latest development.
UPDATE TWO: Oh look, a response!
[Via Tom Gresham]
Done!
ReplyDeleteCOLORADO
ReplyDeleteCOME TO LIFE
Why? Are they dead?
Dead to me, at least.
Who will bury you, Colorado?
Add this:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/07-290.pdf
"Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment. We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding."."