Funny, how when Holder wants documents, he get them.
Hey, having their ox gored could really make this interesting. Add the stigma of being used and scorned, and we just might see the media whores erupt into full-blown, bipolar bitchy fury.
"There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad collection of the telephone communications of The Associated Press and its reporters. These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP's newsgathering operations, and disclose information about AP's activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know," Pruitt said.Sounds like steam escaping.
I may just microwave me some popcorn...
Holder was just doing a background check on the media before they exercised their first amendment rights - if they have nothing to fear and aren't a criminal, why would they worry?
ReplyDeleteAP has just discovered they fit Lenin's definition of "useful idiot." I'm sure Holder feels the same way about the 1st Amendment that he does about the 2nd, he's just much less vocal about it.
ReplyDeleteNaw, it's an abusive marriage.
ReplyDeleteJust watch, the victim will make all sorts of excuses for the violent one's behavior: "He's really a good man, down underneath it all."
Don't believe me? The media's entire belief structure depends on maintaining the idea of the State being Good. That's why they shill so hard for it.
Meanwhile, CNN tools call for still more surveillance: http://www.infowars.com/cnn-calls-for-real-time-police-state-surveillance/
ReplyDelete(It was so successful in stopping the Boston bombings, don'tcha know)
Other commieprogs love this destruction of the BOR keeps them "safe":
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/05/13/2005021/doj-yemen-aqap/?mobile=nc
Shameless tools. Apparently, the big-picture view from these quislings is, some pain from their own ranks is OK, as long as it advances their commieprog agenda. It appears that CNN and their "authorized journalists" are willing to sacrifice the 1st, 4th and 5th Amendments as long as that entails shutting down potential whistle-blowers and the traitors in their own ranks who would assist those who, on occasion, stick their necks out when they've learned too much about Big Brother.
Since most of the Lame-Stream Urinalists are simply transcribers for their Prog/commie government masters, there's little mystery as to why this apparent dichotomy between two sympathetic, sycophantic factions, exists.
Perhaps their thinking is, it's better to shut down the few out of their ranks who would chase down a real story. If everything is recorded, all they have to do is show, and narrate, the film at 11:00.
Besides - who but a criminal has anything to worry about in a total surveillance state? Just add cameras in all bedrooms and public restrooms, and everything will be complete.
Wait - if we just eliminated that pesky 3rd amendment we could all have a soldier/guardian watching over us 24/7.
All you commieprogs can then safely retire to your rubber rooms. After all, I'm sure none of YOU mindless busybodies ever do anything you'd feel the need to keep private.
If it saves just one child's life...