Acknowledging that questions such as “What part of “shall not be
infringed’ don’t you understand?” and “Where in the Constitution do you
or Congress presume to get the authority to enforce any kind of ‘gun
control’?” would be valid comments from the perspective of founding
intent, Gun Rights Examiner nonetheless feels compelled to pass this
information along to inform readers of this development, and to give
those whose activities are impacted -- admittedly a relatively small
(but important) segment of gun owners -- a heads-up to voice their
concerns. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner report notes a minor form change. That a form even exists is something we need to work on.
Far as I can tell, it's still facebook, twitter or google simply managed by discus. I don't see a way to comment without one of those accounts.
ReplyDeleteBetter for many people, of course.
Why trouble yourself in attempts to login and use their blank-blank form?
ReplyDeleteQUOTE:
Comments will be accepted until September 20, 2013 and can be sent to Gary Schaible, National Firearms Act Branch at Gary.Schaible@atf.gov.
There's a direct email address, and . . . there asking you to use it.
By the way, that also gives you the underlying structure of the ATF's mail server account naming scheme. If you have real names of other ATF employees, it would be reasonable to use the same naming schema for them.