“It is lamentable that the government seems to argue that the
fabricated story of Shipley’s firearm killing a Mexican military officer
was a fair inference from the evidence,” the brief explained. “Again,
after the jury verdict and before sentencing, the United States conceded
that these representations were fabricated.
Think of what that means. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner report brings the latest chapter in a story with bizarre twists that I first started covering in 2009. True to form, if you do
a Google News search for "John Shipley," the only one reporting on his case is me.
I'm sorry but why should I care if the only-one thug-pigs eat their own?
ReplyDeleteI understand why you and many others feel that way.
ReplyDeleteTwo reasons:
1. Because ultimately, it's not about Shipley, it's about ill-defined rules that could catch ANY collector and be applied at whim.
2. Because if our side stands for justice, it stands for justice for all, and we just gained a new ally with valuable knowledge and experience. Or at least I did.