Sunday, September 08, 2013

Gun owners have vested interest in opposing U.S. Syrian intervention

Does anyone believe in such a scenario, bearing in mind the heavy hand we saw in Watertown, that a broadly-imposed martial law situation would leave gun owners unmolested? [More]
Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes it depends on what the meaning of the term “limited strikes” is.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.