Monday, September 16, 2013

Navy Yard shooter(s) relied on gun free zones to massacre defenseless personnel

[A] second fact also emerges that is also indisputable: the monopoly of violence fanatics are working themselves into full blood-dance/feeding frenzy mode. [More]
This evening's Gun Rights Examiner commentary notes some lifeless, black eyes -- like a doll's eyes.

10 comments:

  1. The lilting "Authorized Journalists" at SFGate say this about the murderer:

    "He is believed to have a criminal record there and to be a holder of a concealed carry weapon permit."

    http://www.sfgate.com/news/crime/article/Officials-Navy-Yard-shooter-ID-ed-as-Aaron-Alexis-4817906.php

    Wow. In Texas, they give criminals CWP's? Seems even citizens end up in jail there for carrying legally. Something doesn't smell right.


    ReplyDelete
  2. And again- Several news article about this attack seem to have been written on Sunday- and filed for publication on Monday after the event occurred. Hmmm......

    ReplyDelete
  3. Guns don't kill people. Gun-free zones kill people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was thinking of similarities between this incident and Newtown - has anyone pondered the sightings in both shootings of "possible other shooters involved" wearing army camoflouge? Then were explained away later with whatever they could come up with to explain it away. Newtown - it was a hunter in the woods nearby. I'm sorry, in my area of the country hunters wear bright orange so they can hunt safely and would never dream of hunting near a school. Isnt that illegal? Well anyway, so far into the current "story" those additional suspects have already been explained away and we are focused on the crazy nut job who got a gun from a gun shop etc etc. I know everyone says false flag, but I am starting to think that neither one of these dead scapegoats pulled a trigger at all. Does anyone else think the same thing? People need to explain how the false flag could possibly have happened before they can convince the masses - The sightings of other shooters being covered up is so in your face I want to puke.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Funny how both the Newtown shooting and this one both had sightings of additional shooters wearing camofloug. Then explained away and never questioned again. And these poor dead Scapegoats are not alive to explain why they did what they did. Is it possible they did not pull a trigger at all?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anons: do you have links to credible sources on camo sightings?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mr. Codrea, I assume your question on credible sources for camoflaged men sightings was for the Navy Yard killings?

    If not, and you're also interested in witness reports (on lamestream media camera) of other camouflaged men at the Sandy Hook school and at the Sikh Temple killings, I have archived copies available that I will provide.

    -PeaceableGuy

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't have the resources to reopen Sandy Hook and the Sikh temple. But because so much has been said about those that has gained acceptance without proper and credible sourcing, my concern is basically this: If you're going to post that mysterious men in camo were at the Navy Yard --and understanding that men in camo at a military facility might not be a totally unprecedented occurrence-- the implication is government provocateurs creating a false flag op did the shooting and had a ready patsy. I'm not saying that's not the case, I'm just saying if you're going to post such allegations here without identifying who you are and how you know, and without providing something documented besides your blog comment, well, that's not going to wash here. I expect the same standard I demand of myself when I publish-- credible sourcing. Who says camo guys were there, who says it's a false flag, etc., and what PROOF do they offer?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree - without evidence showing other camouflage-wearing attackers at the Navy Yard, the claims are moot.

    Of course, as you note, camouflage uniforms are not something out of place on many/most military bases.

    Evil exists, and it doesn't necessarily need government false-flag operations to manifest itself.

    -PeaceableGuy

    ReplyDelete
  10. True, Peaceable Guy, evil does exist, and doesn't necessarily need a gov't false flag to manifest itself. But isn't it curious how, when such a travesty does occur, gov't is quick to jump on it for its agenda?

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.