I'm disappointed they didn't just let him have the equipment. Aren't the liberals the ones who say to just "let them have it"? Nothing's worth killing someone over some equipment that's probably insured anyway. Or is that only the case if it happens to one of the masses?
I'm disappointed they didn't just let him have the equipment. Aren't the liberals the ones who say to just "let them have it"? Nothing's worth killing someone over some equipment that's probably insured anyway. Or is that only the case if it happens to one of the masses?
ReplyDelete