Bellamy’s comments, written in consultation with, and endorsed and co-submitted by four other practicing attorneys, noted that while the proposed amendments include some “important and useful clarifications ... the remainder ...takes several backwards steps, which increase costs ... provide no discernible benefit to public safety, and, in the case of firearm noise suppressors (‘silencers’), arbitrarily impedes access to important hearing protection equipment.” [More]
Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes speak now or forever hold your peace. If you think this doesn't concern you, think again.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.