At this point it is unknown if FTB will reconsider based on the
clarified manufacturing process, or whether FTB might consider the
precursor receiver a “firearm” regardless based on the effort and
sophistication necessary to complete the receiver and make it
functional. Also at issue is whether ATF agents relied on the FTB
assessment or had subsequent information leading them to question it,
which could have implications on sworn “probable cause” statements they
submitted to the court in order to obtain warrants for seizures from
Ares, EP Armory, and other suppliers. [More]
This evening’s Gun Rights Examiner exclusive report notes by all rights this should not even be an issue, but nonetheless, those who may be caught up in it should heed some warnings.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.