“Note how the courts turned the state's hurdle of ‘beyond a reasonable
doubt’ -- as was intended to be decided by an informed and empowered
jury -- into a rigged hurdle against the defendants to prove that they
‘would've been likely to win’ -- as ‘determined’ allegedly in good faith
by one or more ‘justices’ or judges,” my friend observed. “Thus
changing the presumption of innocence to more of a presumption of guilt.
How do 'justices' know what a jury would've done had it been a fair
trial? Some kind of crystal ball?" [More]
Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes a “secret” power
that must stay hidden in order to be used, and doesn't that just tell us everything we need to know about how far things have been allowed to degrade?
Trial by jury doesn't mean much, when 95% of convictions are by plea bargain...
ReplyDelete