Thursday, March 06, 2014

Oak Tree Won't Go Away

Two relevant updates from Michael S. Rosenwald at The Washington Post:
Trust me when I say this is not my final word.

I have some very interesting documentation from one source with some relevant connections, and had an extended telephone conversation last night with another person who has some firsthand insights. I will be revisiting this again, pointing at some dots, and doing what I can from my end to connect them.
at

1 comment:

  1. Anonymous3/06/2014 5:11 PM

    I keep reading in these articles regarding smart guns that " we should let the market decide" etc from the people pushing this so called innovation . And as I see it , the market ( being gun owners) has loudly declared they don't want or need it . And yet they continue to push these things on us under the guise of "safety" .

    Personally , if LE and military won't even consider it , then why would I give up proven tech for LESS safety afforded by this new tech . Amazingly , with hundreds of "old school" firearms being in house and accessible within my extended families homes over the past 50+ years , there has been zero negative incidences involving firearms. And that can be attributed to proper teaching and respect for the tools we have . So why do I "need" to have a tech that just adds more steps to my providing protection to me and my loved ones?

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.