Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Lesser-known SAFE Act lawsuit raises unique points and risks for gun rights

“The Court ordered the return of Razzano’s long arms [but] after years of litigation ... Razzano is still ‘ineligible’ for a Nassau County pistol license, and thus under the SAFE Act is subject to having all of his ‘weapons’ confiscated, including hunting rifles and shotguns for self-defense in his home,” the current Razzano lawsuit explains. [More]
Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes an overlooked case that deserves attention for no other reason than one of basic justice.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.