"The ruling, handed down on Thursday by state Supreme Court Judge Thomas McNamara, also says Robert Schulz and his co-plaintiffs did not prove that the Safe Act infringes on their state constitutional rights." [More]No, of course not.
What do you expect from a functionary appointed by Pataki?
This is what happens when you accept anti-gun Republicans under the excuse that if you don't, you'll get a Democrat.
As Hillary asks...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.