Both sides should have a vested interest in apprehending anyone who would be involved in such a thing, and if they can agree on nothing else, they should be circulating the photos and information within their spheres of influence, and urging anyone with knowledge to come forward. [More]
Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes some common ground has been identified—providing the antis are actually sincere about wanting to reduce “gun crimes,” as opposed to counting on them.
"Both sides should have a vested interest in" ruling out the premeditated "implantation" of firearms in a store where it's finding will do the most to bolster the goals, standards, and (lack of) character of the anti-gun crowd.
ReplyDeleteGiven the cynical viewpoint I have been forced to accept towards government and anti-gunners after constant exposure to crimes committed by government agents and anti-gunners, is it any wonder my first thought is that the most plausible exp0lanation was a disinformation loay?
Because when have you known a criminal (outside government, that is, and outside the insanity practiced by anti-gunners) to deliberately give up a gun during the commission of a crime?
Though I suppose both government agents and anti-gunners have weapons that were used in a crime and which are too hot to hold on to.