But Metcalf stands alone in being the writer/editor of a well-known shooting sports magazine who turned his back on the intent of the Second Amendment... [More]
No he doesn't. It's just that
Petzal and Field & Stream committed their transgressions back when the Internet was still in the future for most gun owners, and its power to facilitate grassroots activism had yet to be widely discovered and applied. Between that and being a Fuddmag, they basically skated free from the economic repercussions of betraying us on EBRs at the time we needed leadership from those with voices and megaphones the most.
Thank you for your erudite analysis.
ReplyDeleteI have no idea what you just said.
Did you click on the links?
ReplyDeleteLooked solid to me. Maybe it was the Words Of Many Syllables causing confusion?
ReplyDelete