Yesterday's GRE premise: Ignoring illegal alien threat advances ‘gun control’ agenda.
Twitter reply: "I say the opposite since more people now understand the need for self defense."
If that opposite holds true for the premise, it holds true for its supporting arguments. Q.E.D. Therefore, it's good that we financially support and vote for those who enable unchecked illegal immigration. It's good that the administration will bring them in as new voters. It's good that violent crime and security threats will increase.
And most of all, it must be good that aside from a few of the weaker voices warning about it, and comparatively failing at getting their message out, all the major "pro-gun" players with real mass influence are either silent, avoiding the issue, or directly complicit in enabling it.
So why oppose any "gun control" or any pro-illegal aliens/anti-gun candidate or anti-gun policy? After all, think how much more deep and widespread the understanding of the people of the need for self defense will be.
Without seeing such logic fleshed out, I'd conclude there were no more understanding people than the inmates at Dachau. What good did their superior insights do them?
Must be why Michael Bloomberg & Grover Norquist formed that PAC to continue welcoming millions of terrorists, psychos, gangsters, rapists, thugs, etc. Catch & Release, etc. Bloomberg's secretly pro gun!
ReplyDeleteThe more violent crimes, the freer we will be! It's not like people will roll for a militarized police state or anything like that. We just need to trust the sophisticates. Thanks Grover!
Well,
ReplyDeleteI stand with Larry on this topic ... and David.
We must all beware of threats, both direct and indirect.
I wish *GOA* stood with Larry and took its own recognition of over-immigration as a gun rights issue. Then we would've won Joe Miller in Alaska, McDaniel in Mississippi, and many other races.
ReplyDeleteInstead they refused to issue provisional grades, thereby unwittingly helping Rove get a clean sweep in the primaries.