So instead of facts he lies and relies on snotty ad hominem and Alinsky Rule 5 snark? [More]
Well, yeah. "Progressives" and Opposite Day, you know.
It's in response to the thoughtful essay by Vik Khanna that we talked about last week, and I can't help but note Mr. PhD in Bioethics gave a non-working link to it. I wonder if that was an honest mistake, or if he just doesn't want fair-minded readers seeing the last thing Khanna was doing was "squealing in terror."
I also found the comment by the anti claiming he's gotten death threats unbelievable. Any bets he's never turned those over to the police?
Feel free to go on over and show Vik some support.
Pay this man no attention, he's just one more member of the ethnic group that can't be mentioned that is almost always at the forefront of the Gun Confiscaiton Lobby.
ReplyDeleteMove along.
Now, now, Pat H. While there is no doubt a lot of truth in that observation exemplified by many, we have great friends among "those people" too, as evidenced by JPFO and others I could cite. I don't like to tar an entire group with the same brush--the very act seems kind of ... collectivist... wouldn't you agree?
ReplyDeleteVik's holding his own pretty well, and "Nicki" is kicking @$$ and taking names.
ReplyDeleteStill, open forums like this should be inundated with logical (and not coincidentally) pro-gun arguments. There's no reason gun owners shouldn't own/dominate the airwaves. There is certainly enough of us.