Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Going Full B. Todd

ATF’s classification of the plaintiff’s device as a silencer within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(24) is correct, reasonable, in accordance with the law, considered all relevant data and thus was not arbitrary and capricious. [More]
ATF's "Answer to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Sig Sauer v ATF": Of course it's not, of course it didn't and of course it was...

[Via everrest]
at

1 comment:

  1. Maxwell10/21/2014 2:39 PM

    Muzzle BRAKE! Muzzle BRAKE! Damn it, why must I suffer legislation by morons who have abso-f***ing-lutely NO knowledge of what they're legislating, nor why?

    Screw these bastards, they lost me right from 'go'.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.