More credible would be the argument that the paper is just doing its part to help the MILMs appear more impressive and effective than they actually are, and to sway lawmakers into believing that. The target readership relying on “The Hill’s powerhouse of vehicles” for an accurate understanding of the issues makes such misuse of language all the more inexcusable. [More]My latest JPFO Alert notes words have meaning, something "journalists" know better than most.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.