Monday, April 28, 2014

Owning or carrying firearms does not make celebrities ‘pro-gun’

The fact is, the celebrities in the slideshow exemplify “I’ve got mine” while their conduct undermines the rights of everyone else. [More]

Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes if we don’t insist on “pro-gun” also meaning “pro-rights,” we’ll be surrendering yet another term to the “progressives.”

We're the Only Ones Checkered Enough

Gualtieri said he was concerned about Langlais' history at first but was "willing to give people second chances." [More]
And evidently third and fourth and fifth and...

[Via Florida Guy]

Good Thing There's Plenty of Ammo

Otherwise, this could  have an impact! [More]

Funny. The government keeps collecting more and more data and can't even manage the basics.

[Via Jess]

We're the Only Ones Dignifying Enough

Colorado's governor, Denver's mayor and other dignitaries receive a more robust Denver police response than the public under new rules recently adopted by the city's 911 system. [More]
Well, yeah, because it only makes sense the commissars' lives are more important than yours and your family's...

[Via cydl]

We're the Only Ones Beating the Sh** Out of You Enough

Hey, we want to make it home safely at the end of our shift, and you never can tell about these five-foot-tall Downs Syndrome kids. Besides, what do we look like, doctors...? [More]

Funny...anybody catch Officer Safety He-Man's name...?

The site this is posted on has a current date, but I see from checking around this took place in 2011. A quick search doesn't tell me what ever happened with this -- any bets "nothing"...?

A Word About Comments

Anonymous poster: Yes, thanks, I know about Stevens and his book, and even wrote an article about his flawed contentions and how the media is exploiting them months ago before the recent resurrected interest.  But I haven't moderated your comments through because, per my sidebar "Comment House Rules," I keep them on topic to the subject I'm posting on.

A Legal Paradox

Yep, so keep 'em both off the books. [More]

And don't worry, state, the feds have you covered.

We're the Only Ones Tainted Enough

No charges? [More]

And " they will soon be placed back on the street and even awarded lost overtime pay"...?

Not that Chief Ramsey is a stickler for the rules, at least applying to him and his...
 
[Via Florida Guy]

Forget It Jake, It's Chi-Town

5 Killed, More Than 40 Wounded in Violent Chicago Weekend 
Woman killed while heading home from an anti-violence event among the victims [More

If only they would disarm you and me...

Hey, What Happened to All the Dangers?

[More]

But...but...but... I thought a gun was 257,000 times more likely to kill your entire family, induce you to go on a shooting spree and commit suicide than to ever be used in a defensive situation, plus everybody who owns one has a tiny weenie...

Y'know, if I had a credible death threat made against me, assuming it was not immediate, I'd report it, if for no other reason than to create a record for my legal defense if I had to act later in my physical defense. Curious how, in spite of all the challenges to prove multiple allegations, she's not producing even one police report.

Here's one other statement she repeats ad nauseam:
Does that mean the Bloombergians are dropping all their other demands?  Once I prove myself to Erika, can I practice Constitutional carry anywhere?  Will she and they embrace "shall not be infringed"? Will they join in condemning bans on semi-autos and magazines, and advocate a repeal of the ban on private ownership of post-'86 autos?  Will they demand an end to "gun free zones"?

Not that what she's demanding doesn't have more holes in it than Albert Hall, but putting its total unacceptability aside for a moment, just what does she mean by "all good"?

And for whom? 
 
[Via Florida Guy]


We're the Only Ones Lighting Up Your Life Enough

A Los Angeles Police Department captain in charge of citywide surveillance says the proliferation of technology for keeping tabs on ordinary citizens is no more worrying than the implementation of street lights in early America. [More]
And if they work so well outside the home, think of how much "domestic violence" and "drug crimes" we could curb if you took Capt. Romero's rationale to the next "logical" step.

And hey, don't worry about your license plate being used to try to incriminate you, either.

Funny, how when their own light gets reflected back, these guys circle the wagons... I guess they prefer working in the shadows.

But you?  Say "Chee-eese!"

[Via Michael G]

We're the Only Ones Choking You Up Enough

Guy looks like he'd feel right at home in an XXXL brownshirt. [More]

Funny, how neither of the other two "community heroes" tried to stop him.

[Via William T]

One Question about 'Good Guys with Guns in Schools'

What's to debate? [More]

My beef with Wayne is that he limited it to "Only Ones."

Something he's been doing for years.

And crushing dissent when it's within his control.

We, the millions who pay your substantial salary and perks, are also "good guys with guns," Mr. Executive Vice President.

Notes from a One-Armed Paperhanger

A series of circumstances, including doctor visits, two JPFO alerts due on Tuesday and Thursday, one new article due for a client tomorrow, my magazine article due Tuesday and the regular work on Examiner will no doubt impact the number of posts on WarOnGuns.  Add to that two new stories I believe will be major, that is, things to be ignored by the "Authorize Journalists," and I'm stretched pretty thin this week.  I'll continue to provide daily content for this blog, but those of you who go to the trouble of sending me tips, please understand if I just can't get to them, including all those links I got over the weekend when I was in Indianapolis at the NRA Annual Meeting.

This Day in History: April 28

I think it necessary, therefore, as I am not well informed of the full ex tent of the discontent, to call our force together from all parts, as well to awe the malcontents, if any there be, as to prevent the enemy from attempting anything in consequence thereof. [More]