Friday, May 16, 2014

Connecticut rights group joins in brief for state gun law challenge

The brief, filed by a team of attorneys that includes noted Second Amendment lawyer, scholar and author Stephen P. Halbrook, argues that Connecticut’s ban on so-called “assault weapons“ and standard capacity ammunition magazines violates the Second Amendment, and that “provisions of [the] ban are unconstitutionally vague.” [More]
This afternoon’s Gun Rights Examiner report rings the bell on round two of a title fight.

'Liberal' gun group member proposes online campaign to #EndGunShaming

Having had time to think more on this, some other thoughts now occur to me. First, the shame is not on gun owners, it is on the people stooping to insults and crudities. I refuse to feel shame for some obnoxious troll's many character defects. And why engage with someone essentially screaming insults? You would ignore and put distance between yourself and someone doing that in the real world (keeping the option of defending yourself open if need be), so why not practice the same prudent discipline in the virtual one? [More]
Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes it’s just like Opposite Day “progressives” to expect us to be ashamed by their offensive behavior.

Because You Never Know...

...when the livestock might return fire.  [More]

Besides, what good are these if you don't look the part?

[Via Jess]

A Strong Commitment

No, not to ourselves and our posterity, silly... [More]

Why should he care, when all most of his critics do is gripe in internet comments, enabling him to "cruise... to victory ... easily beating two tea party challengers"?

Hey, what's the deal here? I thought this blog was about guns.

Great Society II

I'm imagining a movie title here, with the tag line: "If This Doesn't Finish the Republic, Nothing Will." [More]
 
Figures this statist fraud would want to star in the sequel.

[Via Michael G]

What's in YOUR Safe?

Tonight, on ATSNtv's "Stop the Threat"... [Details]

And did you remember to vote?

Despicable Deception?

It's a pretty damning indictment. [More]

I haven't seen the NAGR fundraising note that this is responding to--a link would have helped. [SEE UPDATE TWO, BELOW]

Rhetoric aside, there is one point that needs to be made in re background checks, from no less a source than the feds: "Effectiveness depends on the ability to reduce straw purchasing, requiring gun registration and an easy gun transfer process."

So this isn't about siding with either group, or pointing out flaws, or questioning motives, or effectiveness, or tactics, or anything else--plenty of other places will host that conversation. The discussion I'm inviting here centers on that core point.

Is it debatable?

[Via several of you]

UPDATE: Dave Workman goes into detail in "Gunfight: War of words erupts; ‘aid and comfort to enemy?"

UPDATE TWO: Here's the NAGR piece

A Work in Progress

One hive insect queen's "perfect union" is another man's tyranny. [More]

By the Numbers

Funny thing about those photos--it looks like most of the people are facing inward, meaning it looks like attention-seekers were outnumbered by observers... [More]

Say, Here's an Idea...

Maybe we could have a Con-Con or something... [More]

Seeing as how NRA, quite properly, assessed campaign finance limits were well within the scope of that "single issue," perhaps they're ready next time to give Wayne's "true champion of the Second Amendment" the "F" he deserves.

Lies Heating Up

It's what Prozis do to get control--over everything. [More]

It's telling: Even when reporting deception they continue to repeat it, by choosing the photo they did and making no mention of this.

This Day in History: May 16

As soon as you have concluded with the officers, the Quantity of Rum or Whiskey which will be best to be commuted, agreeable to the Orders of this Date—you will be pleased to notify Mr Sands (who if necessary, will attend you for the purpose) and agree with him upon the particular Articles in which the Compensation shall be made. [More]