A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ENACTING AND ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE PEOPLE OF A MEASURE RELATING TO FIREARMS. [More]Yeah, well, uh...
Listen, send the kids out of the room for a minute?
All clear?
No, I'm not going to let them provoke me into losing my composure, but you know what I was going to say to "Sponsors" Randall Friese, Charlene Fernandez, Rosanna Gabaldón, Stefanie Mach, Victoria Steele, and Albert Hale.
Some of us won't surrender to traitors. And it looks like the same cabal is behind this abomination.
Yeah, I know, these won't pass -- now. But 10 years from now, all bets will be off. And it's why the Bloombergians, like all childish creatures, ever impatient with their demands to have it all NOW, are circumventing the legislatures.
What all need to understand is some of us will not comply and will not disarm.
Their move.
[Via Bluesgal]
Yeah, those idiots always forget about that dangerous third choice available to us.
ReplyDeleteWhy start with the 2nd Amendment?
ReplyDeleteStart with the 1st Amendment instead:
"A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ENACTING AND ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE PEOPLE OF A MEASURE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXPRESSION THEREOF; OR ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR OF THE PRESS; OR THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE, AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES."
Unpalatable? Just as much.
I am unfamiliar with Arizona politics, being far from that state as I am from Olympia, Washington.
ReplyDeleteWhat chance does this criminal nonsense have of passing in the Arizona legislature?
I had thought Arizona was a comparatively pro-gun state?
GC
Whoeee ... didn't even have to read the whole thing -- stepped in the "substance" in the first article before even getting to section B.
ReplyDeleteThis is nothing other than a referendum to set aside the Constitution of the United States with particular reference to the rights to keep and bear arms and the rights to keep and dispose of personal property.
This cannot be the result of an innocent error but must be the result of a decision to deliberately subvert the clear meaning of that document.
Perhaps it needs must be made more clear?
ReplyDeleteRandall Friese, Charlene Fernandez, Rosanna Gabaldón, Stefanie Mach, Victoria Steele, and Albert Hale of Arizona
Having been found GUILTY of TREASONOUS userpation of the Bill of Rights 2ND Amendment by Drumhead Courts Martial are hear-by declared OUTLAW that none may aid or do trade of any type with them.
They are scentenced to DEATH and since OUTLAW any man may turn his hand against them to carry out the scentence of this Courts Martial.
Colonel of the Peoples Malitia.
Do they no realise that this is where such acts lead them?
Gee, "Colonel," that's pretty brave of you, anonymously posting a death sentence on specific individuals in a place where the name attached to site content is mine. Thanks, I appreciate being volunteered for "malitia" duty.
ReplyDeleteYou know of course if this triggers any law enforcement interest, unless you're using something really good to mask your trail, investigators can probably ID you, right? And get the info straight from Blogger?
By the way, I am curious how you got your commission. If ranks aren't self-appointed and you have actual authority, can you make me a sergeant in charge of the booze?
Onlt empty bottles and cans left!
ReplyDeleteThere has been no Courts Martial or scentence and the IP it all leads to has no idea of the content of the posting.
Col. (retd.)