Monday, March 30, 2015

Brady Legal Acumen

It's funny. Just this morning we saw the Bradys claiming victory on a case they ended up losing.

Now, while doing research for today's GRE, I found a pre-McDonald article:
Although the Brady Campaign expects the Chicago ordinance to be challenged, it thinks it may survive because Chicago does not have the restrictions on long guns like the ones found in Washington, D.C. The Chicago law may also survive in the view of the Brady Campaign because the decision in the D.C. case will likely not resolve the issue of whether the Second Amendment applies to the states and other cities that are not federal enclaves.
These people and their lawyers continually suck, which is fine by me.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.