I'm not trying to diminish the guy, and it's wonderfully refreshing to hear such talk coming from a "leader," but thing is, some of us "followers" have been bangin' those pots and pans for decades.
Lee, by the way, is rated A+ by both GOA and Numbers USA. I'm disappointed to see his book being tied in as paving the way for a Con-Con when his major premise is the other side cheats and gets away with it all the time -- this write-up makes it appear that way by saying his book "could play a role in the building effort to hold a Convention of States to pass constitutional amendments aimed at limiting Washington's power." I'm not getting why that sentence was put in, as other sources say Lee "is concerned about a convention creating the potential for a barrage of bad amendments.”
UPDATE: Oath Keepers has more on "Why the Article V Convention Must Be Opposed."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.