"“Under appellant’s (Florida Carry’s) interpretation, the Legislature intended, without specifically stating so, to prohibit firearms on school property except for any place that might be considered a student’s home while on school property,” said the ruling, written by appeals-court Judge Joseph Lewis. “Reaching that result, however, requires a strained interpretation of the statutes involved.”"
Compared to the strained interpretations of the very clear statement "the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"?
How is this not infringement of the right to keep and bear arms?
"“Under appellant’s (Florida Carry’s) interpretation, the Legislature intended, without specifically stating so, to prohibit firearms on school property except for any place that might be considered a student’s home while on school property,” said the ruling, written by appeals-court Judge Joseph Lewis. “Reaching that result, however, requires a strained interpretation of the statutes involved.”"
ReplyDeleteCompared to the strained interpretations of the very clear statement "the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"?
How is this not infringement of the right to keep and bear arms?