Wednesday, May 04, 2016

There's No Justification for This

The State of New Jersey argued that I did not meet “justifiable need” for a carry license because I had "other options" I could pursue. I could:
1: Shut down my business; or
2: Conduct my private business in a different manner; or
3: Hire a private armed security guard. [More]
Funding is being solicited for a challenge.

Stephen Stamboulieh and Alan Beck will be filing the case.
at

1 comment:

  1. KUETSA5/05/2016 12:50 AM

    So in New Jersey, a citizen in danger of "substantial bodily harm", does not, in the eyes of the court, meet "justifiable need" for a carry license to have the capability to PREVENT "substantial bodily harm". In New Jersey a citizen must first SURVIVE "substantial bodily harm" to meet "justifiable need" for a carry license to have the capability to PREVENT "substantial bodily harm".

    Next, in New Jersey, we must define "SUBSTANTIAL" as it equates to bodily harm.

    In New Jersey, as it equates to meeting "justifiable need" for a carry license, BODILY HARM DOES NOT QUALIFY AS "SUBSTANTIAL" IF YOU SURVIVE YOUR INJURIES.

    CITIZENS ARE EXPENDABLE

    Every Communist must grasp the truth: Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.