You just don't get it do ya? The Government restricted those weapons, making them "not in common use...". Therefor the Government can restrict them because the government restricted them making them "not in common use..." and thus restrictable. Why don't ya wise up and get with the program? What are ya, stoopit?
Do you really expect a branch of the Government to rule that another branch of the Government overstepped its own authority according to a branch of the Government? Do you still believe in justice? In truth? How about Dudley Do-Right? Do you really think that any of the nine robed dictators on the Supreme Court, because that is where it is going, with the possible exception of Justice Thomas, gives half a goddamn about inalienable rights or original intent?
“It makes but little difference in my estimation whether Congress or the Supreme Court are invested with this power. If the Federal government in all or any of its departments is to prescribe the limits of its own authority, and the states are bound to submit to the decision and are not allowed to examine and decide for themselves when the barriers of the constitution shall be overleaped, this is practically ‘a government ‘without limitation of powers.’ The states are at once reduced to mere petty corporations and the people are entirely at your mercy.” - Robert Y. Hayne (1791-1839) [W3]
You just don't get it do ya? The Government restricted those weapons, making them "not in common use...". Therefor the Government can restrict them because the government restricted them making them "not in common use..." and thus restrictable. Why don't ya wise up and get with the program? What are ya, stoopit?
ReplyDeleteDo you really expect a branch of the Government to rule that another branch of the Government overstepped its own authority according to a branch of the Government? Do you still believe in justice? In truth? How about Dudley Do-Right? Do you really think that any of the nine robed dictators on the Supreme Court, because that is where it is going, with the possible exception of Justice Thomas, gives half a goddamn about inalienable rights or original intent?
Call me jaded.
“It makes but little difference in my estimation whether Congress or the Supreme Court are invested with this power. If the Federal government in all or any of its departments is to prescribe the limits of its own authority, and the states are bound to submit to the decision and are not allowed to examine and decide for themselves when the barriers of the constitution shall be overleaped, this is practically ‘a government ‘without limitation of powers.’
ReplyDeleteThe states are at once reduced to mere petty corporations and the people are entirely at your mercy.” - Robert Y. Hayne (1791-1839)
[W3]
It is unlikely that we shall prevail in the courts. Next case.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ar15.com/mobile/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=1860457
ReplyDelete