"Ninety-nine people out of a hundred would interpret this language as threatening and to suggest otherwise is disingenuous at best and dangerous at worst. Bottom line: It is un-American to threaten journalists," the letter said. [More]Where'd you take your survey sample from?
Real threats don't need interpretation.
"Analysts have speculated that the group is doing so to motivate existing members and recruit new members."
ReplyDeleteAnd the NYT and other groups feel "threatened." What a load of hogwash.
Typical liberals. They could never define what exactly is "threatening" that the NRA wrote. But, like hate speech; the Libs can't define it, but they know it when they see/hear it.
"Pantie-Wringer"s is the perfect description.
The lack of a Comments section tells you everything you need to know.
ReplyDelete