Another reason we shouldn’t trust Hastings is that, in spite of his oath to the Constitution, he has worked to undermine rather than support and defend it, specifically in regard to the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights. [More]HE doesn't trust US. Let THAT sink in.
Hastings' impeachment was reversed by the SCOTUS. That's not constitutional, but congress didn't stop that action.
ReplyDeleteThat's how he qualifies for congress, he's not a prohibited person.
He should have been, however.
Hastings's conviction and removal were upheld by SCOTUS:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.leagle.com/decision/1993840837fsupp31839.xml
ORDER
This Court having reconsidered this matter in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Nixon v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 732, 122 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993) concludes that plaintiff's claims cannot be sustained. Accordingly, it is this 21 day of October, 1993
[837 F.Supp. 6]
ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted. It is further
ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is denied.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous comment placed here.