Monday, December 18, 2017

Why Not Just Cut to the Chase and Elect Him Mayor?

The man who was convicted of carrying a gun but acquitted of murder in the shooting of Kate Steinle on a San Francisco Bay pier never actually possessed the weapon in a legal sense ... [More]
Yeah. Hence the "illegal possession" charge.

And he threw it in the ocean to keep it from shooting. There will be San Francisco jurors dumb/brainwashed enough to buy that.

[Via Mack H]

1 comment:

  1. Like I said at the time:
    If the jury didn't believe his 'I picked up a gun and it went bang' story, then they had to convict him of homicide.
    If they did believe it, then he didn't commit unlawful possession of a firearm.

    Finding him not guilty of homicide and guilty of possession was not a logically defensible decision.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.