Trump Selects a Justice in the Mold of Antonin Scalia [More]
How do they know?
And what
limits does he support?
This ain't exactly a ringing testimonial:
In U.S. v. Games-Perez, Gorsuch stated, in dicta, that an individual should not be able to be convicted of a “gun possession” offense unless the person knew his actions were unlawful.
What,
like me? Like the "
I will not comply" movement?
He also said "the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own firearms and may not be infringed lightly...”
"Lightly"?
I guess GOA does not agree that we should
look before we buy and are stuck with a judge forever? Instead they present a compelling reason to leap before we look?
"We understand that the defeat of President Trump's nominee could mean that Scalia's seat would held open by the minority until it could be filled by someone who is rabidly anti-gun -- and who would tip the balance of the court in favor of the repeal of the Second Amendment as an individual right."
I call hyperbole on that. Only if Republicans let them.
As long as I'm grousing:
When are we going to see specifically called-out action on
this pledge and what we'd agreed was an existential threat to RKBA (46 minute mark)? Because I see nothing on GOA's site indicating it's a factor. Matter of fact, I see them
stumping for a guy who got a
68% score on immigration.
And I'm sure
Ms. Pepper is a very nice person. Why do all the measurable achievements -- as presented in the plug -- appear to be for "sporting purposes"?
Mr. Macy: Care to give us something more substantial and show us how she would
answer the same questions Mr. Stamboulieh did?
I can't count the number of times I've gone to bat for GOA over the years because of a truly different way of doing things in Springfield vs. Fairfax. Sadly, I'm no longer seeing it.
Perhaps it's me. Perhaps I'm the one who's too extreme.
What am I asking for that "The only no compromise gun lobby in Washington" would want to shy away from?