Friday, March 30, 2018

We Apologize for the Inconvenience


[More]
Do they also apologize for denying citizens their mandated-by-law right to comment?

I note clicking on the "Public Comments" link to see what's been submitted thus far goes to comments submiutted for the advance notice that ended in January.

How many comment posters have been discouraged now, and how did this happen on an issue of such vital interest to gun owners?

Will the comment period now be extended to make up for the time it has been closed?

at

4 comments:

  1. DAN III3/30/2018 10:56 AM

    The scum of fedgov or .gov in general, are going to do what they want to do no matter how many comments support the opposite of the Powers That Be.

    Got ammo ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mack3/30/2018 12:56 PM

    David, I got this response today:

    "Comments are due 06/27/2018 at 11:59 PM EDT."

    Also, "read the 35,709 comments ..."

    * https://www.regulations.gov/docketBrowser?rpp=50&so=DESC&sb=postedDate&po=0&dct=PS&D=ATF-2018-0001

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3/30/2018 2:05 PM

    David, just read part of the text for the proposed rules. They can't ban them with the wording used. (for the same reason Obama's aft had to let them be marketed).
    The rule states; " allowing the user to mimic full auto with only ONE pull of the trigger".
    Not so; bump stocks just help a person pull the trigger faster. But the trigger has to be pulled every time! Or "fast" semi auto fire, if you will.
    NFA definition of a machine gun is "two or more rounds fired with a single pull of trigger." That doesn't happen with bump fires!.....MTHead

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3/30/2018 3:42 PM

    AAAh, my stupid! they changed the definition of, "a single pull of the trigger" in order to ban them!
    Isn't this the exact same BULLSHIT we just voted against a year ago?.....MTHead

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.