In an earlier case, the Massachusetts high court concluded that stun guns just aren't "arms" for Second Amendment purposes, because ... they aren't usable in the military." [More]Compare to:
“The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional rights to ‘bear arms.”Norman processes the disconnect:
[Via Paul G]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.