Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Judicial Cognitive Dissonance

In an earlier case, the Massachusetts high court concluded that stun guns just aren't "arms" for Second Amendment purposes, because ...  they aren't usable in the military." [More]
Compare to:
“The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional rights to ‘bear arms.”
Norman processes the disconnect:


[Via Paul G]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.