Also, she’s intellectually unable to present a coherent case. Consider this Freudian gem:
“I want to talk about the true crux of the issue here, which is that our collective inability to pass gun control restrictions is based on our desire to control other people.”
Uh, yup!
It’s a complete side-splitter how many times she jams the adjective “constitutionally protected” ino the text to refer to abortion, whereas guns, which are in fact explcitly constitutionally protected, never earn that adjective from her once.
The partisan hypocrisy of the left shines and stinks, like a rotten mackerel in the moonlight.
Also, she’s intellectually unable to present a coherent case. Consider this Freudian gem:
ReplyDelete“I want to talk about the true crux of the issue here, which is that our collective inability to pass gun control restrictions is based on our desire to control other people.”
Uh, yup!
It’s a complete side-splitter how many times she jams the adjective “constitutionally protected” ino the text to refer to abortion, whereas guns, which are in fact explcitly constitutionally protected, never earn that adjective from her once.
The partisan hypocrisy of the left shines and stinks, like a rotten mackerel in the moonlight.