Wednesday, May 30, 2018

So Police AREN'T 'There to Protect Us'?

“Plaintiff’s claims share a common question: whether there is constitutional duty under the Fourteenth Amendment for the police to intervene to protect a citizen from criminal conduct by third parties,” Judge Norman K. Moon’s opinion says. “Because I find this duty is not ‘clearly established,’ his claims are barred by qualified immunity.” [More]
Who knew?

And that being the case, who but an idiot or an enemy would prevent a fellow human being from having the means to protect himself?

[Via Mack H]

2 comments:

  1. This is a major opinion.

    Even so, the whiners out for social justice say they will appeal.

    Good luck with that.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I appreciate this contemporaneous confirmation that neither coppers nor any other govt. actor have any duty to defend and protect any particular citizen.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.