1. The prosecutor, despite not having evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt, intended to drag the accused through a pointless trial.
2. The prosecutor had evidence proving the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and now the accused has the poor taste to proclaim a witch hunt after convincing the complaining witness to shut up.
All we know for sure is that somebody in a position of great public trust within the "justice" system is cannot be trusted with power over the lives of others.
So, take your pick, one of these has to be true:
ReplyDelete1. The prosecutor, despite not having evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt, intended to drag the accused through a pointless trial.
2. The prosecutor had evidence proving the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and now the accused has the poor taste to proclaim a witch hunt after convincing the complaining witness to shut up.
All we know for sure is that somebody in a position of great public trust within the "justice" system is cannot be trusted with power over the lives of others.