Worth a Thousand Words

Catherine Koebel stood in front of the Defense League tent with an oversized photo of a child with a gunshot wound to the head. [More]

She doesn't argue for "common sense gun safety laws." She want to see the government take them and melt them.

This Vogue puff piece says:

"My husband, an emergency-medicine physician [had] seen what men with guns could do."

Did he surreptitiously take the picture? Did he get it from a colleague who took it? Did the parents consent? Were any medical ethics violated or hopital patient privacy protocols breached? Was it from a crime scene, and if so, is its dissemination beyond investigators and courts authorized?

Was it legal?

Lest someone counter with a pro-life protestor photo equivalency rebuttal, they'll be arguing they consider a fetus the body of a once-living human child. And yeah, protocols for dignity and basic decency are appropriate.

If she's going to publicly use it to advance her agenda, the public has a right to know: From whom did she get that photo and who is it of?

Be a shame if someone reported her for graphic violence policy violations to the various social media platforms this video appears on...