“We are committed to a violence-free work environment, and we will not tolerate any level of violence or the threat of violence in the workplace. Under no circumstances should anyone bring a weapon to work. If you become aware of a violation of this policy, you should report it to Human Resources immediately. In case of potential violence, contact Google Security.” [More]Of course that "committment" means we can't stop any of it but we will do our part to make sure you can't either.
Per the Miller Court, “the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear … ordinary military equipment … that … could contribute to the common defense.” It’s beyond curious that the monopoly of violence zealots behind the semi-automatic bans justify them by screaming they are “weapons of war.” [More]It really is about freedom and security, you know...
Another anti-gun ballot measure has been filed. As you can see, in this case one of the chief petitioners is not even an Oregon resident. [More]The gist of it, near as I can tell trying to make sense of such things, is they want to make sure pitchfork murderers don't encounter any pesky resistance...
Q: Who should control the guns?A: The government.Q: Do you trust the government?A: No...[Via Jeet]
“This doctrine, invented by the Court out of whole cloth, immunizes public officials even when they commit legal misconduct unless they violated ‘clearly established law.’ That standard is incredibly difficult for civil rights plaintiffs to overcome because the courts have required not just a clear legal rule, but a prior case on the books with functionally identical facts.” [More]Sorry, but no recourse for you. Like it says in the Preamble, "Precedent über alles!"
We are hearing that there is a strong possibility that “Ducey’s Disaster” could be introduced in the Legislature this coming week. Though most of us have not yet seen the actual language of his so-called “School Safety” proposal, his public press release contained more than enough to be concerned about. Everything from court ordered firearms confiscations (and involuntary mental evaluations) that would disarm you based on the feelings of friends or family that you “could” be dangerous, down to proposals that would make parents felons for the unlawful actions of their children. [More]Honest-- I didn't set out to make this a theme for today. I just can't stop from running into it.
“I don’t know how I can responsibly look at those young people and not say ‘We need to do something,’ ” Warner said... [More]Yes, something must be done!
Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI) used an April 2 Fox News Live appearance to announce that she is preparing to introduce legislation to create a federal law allowing firearm confiscation orders. [More]And why not? Her "pro-gun Democrat" NRA Board member husband voted for the Clinton gun ban. Everybody knows he was the guy Wayne stole "jackbooted thugs" from, right?
During live broadcast Dingell said, “Rep. Fred Upton (R) and I are looking at introducing … legislation … at the national level.”That would be this Fred Upton:
 |
| [Click to enlarge] |
FACE is very concerned about the amendments voted and accepted by the Polish Senate to the hunting law in Poland as they would literally kill longstanding Polish hunting traditions, culture and methods. [More]You got that, Fuddskis?
Liberals Have OnlyThis blast from the past has never been more relevant. That's why it will continue to be ignored by everyone but the people the victims have been conditioned to blame.Helped[Ensured] Blacks Fail [More]
 |
| [More] |
Taylor Swift is putting her money and words behind the March for Our Lives. [More]It's easy when you've got an "entire entourage."
“It ain’t got no clip, bud”... [More]Unclear on the concept, are we?
A RAT is caught on camera hiding among hamburger buns on a supermarket shelf in Texas [More]As if we needed any other reason not to shop at Kroger.
Even gun rights advocates, who are afraid of government abuse, say it appears to be working...“We’ve seen the downside of people who are distraught or crazy taking out their problems on the general public,” said Dave Workman of the Bellevue, Wash.-based Second Amendment Foundation. “We don’t want that to happen here.” [More]No, of course we don't. But this makes it sound like ERPOs are an acceptable solution.
The question now is, are we to believe Joe Biden isn’t aware of these, in which case he’s incompetent and unqualified to comment, or should we assume that he's fully aware and says what he says anyway, in which case he’s a liar? That’s a tough one to call (and they're not mutually exclusive), although looking at two previous times he’s presumed authority on self-defense tactics suggests he really is that ignorant. Perhaps cluelessness is something those behind putting Biden in positions of power can count on for reasons of their own. [More]Liar? Dolt? Tool? Why not all three?
