How Much More Substantial Does It Need to Be?

The ATF said that’s not the case, and that they won’t destroy any surrendered bump stocks until all applicable litigation over the matter has been adjudicated. [More]

If that's the case, why did our judge decide "The plaintiff cannot prevail without a “substantial indication of likely success on the merits”?

That agency-wide rule seems a pretty substantial indication they're counting on rubber stamp judges giving "deference" to the administrative bullsh!t du jour instead of on justice and the law.

[Via Bear]