Schofield was very clear that she supports the 2nd amendment, she was only questioning the assault weapons components of what is currently a legal firearm. She said nothing against hunting rifles, shotguns or handguns, let alone against the private ownership of such firearms. [More]And therein lies the problem -- morons like this fellow in "comments" presuming to know what they're talking about. He then goes on in a later post to assert "And the Constitution includes 'with reasonable restrictions' on all components."
What's even more inexcusable is the candidate appears every bit as ignorantly presumptuous.
Give us a break.
I suspect "0%" will prove overly optimistic.
[Via Matthew L]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.