And so, by refusing to read this question, this specific name, Roberts confirmed the whistleblower is, indeed, one Eric Ciaramella. [More]So he did something right by accident?
Tangentially related, curious how Barney Google demands answers from others under threat of prosecution and ruin, but when he's got some 'splanin' to do, feigns being indignant to mask his guilt. The presumption that he can "dignify" anything is laughable-- this freak is scum.
And since when have we stated calling apparatchiks "whistleblowers"?
[Via Carlos Perdue]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.