The state had the burden to prove by “clear and convincing evidence” either that DeRossett knew he was shooting at law enforcement officers, or that he was “furthering” (meaning participating in, or deriving any benefit from) his niece’s prostitution activities. Even if DeRossett knew about the prostitution in his home, his mere knowledge of it does not meet the definition of “furthering." [More]And your point is...?
[Via Michael G]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.