Good Question in 'Comments'

CDA/230 has been abused since its inception in 1996: It has been treated as unilateral, fascistic, protection for publicly-traded corporations (not private companies) that act as proxies for the the elected politicians on both ostensible sides who seek to silence conservatives - especially Christians - and who are beholden to the millionaires and billionaires who operate these leftist enclaves. In other words, the fix has been in. To any who dare defend these corporations: If they are private companies, and this is a free market, then on what basis do they get special Federal protection from liability? How is that not fascism? [More]

The entrenched in government don't need to censor if they can get their proxies to do it for them.

Just like they won't need to order vaccinations if proof will be needed to be employed or to shop...