Tuesday, June 16, 2020

The Balls in Their Court -- Or Not

Supreme Court’s redefinition of ‘sex’ a loss for our constitutional order [More]
Glad to see an "impartial court" focused on "progressive" priorities so vital to perpetual Democrat rule.

Who needs checks and balances and separation of powers anyway...?

[Via Mack H]

UPDATE: Glenn Reynolds is not surprised.

[Via Michael G]
at

1 comment:

  1. Henry6/16/2020 12:02 PM

    The purported "checks and balances" of separation of powers is an illusory security, transparently evident every time the issue in question concerns rulers vs. subjects.

    ReplyDelete

Keep it on topic. Submit tips on different topics via left sidebar Contact Form.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.