Left intentionally unaddressed were the specifics for disputing report after report of “voting irregularities,” making the knee-jerk Twitter designation not only a logical fallacy but a deception designed to make readers discount concerns and instead embrace the all-pervasive, media-parroted narrative that such concerns are “baseless.” [More]
Dispute the disputers. Loudly.
OK! So if we buy their argument that voter fraud and election fraud are too rare to bother with, why are they still upset about 537 votes in Florida in 2000?
ReplyDeleteBecause those 537 votes put George W. Bush in the White House and sent Al Gore home?
They need to make up their minds. Small numbers are not enough to worry about or they are important enough to harp on for 20 years and counting. They can't have it both ways.