I couldn't get through it, chocked full of lies, propaganda, and utter nonsense. I wonder where they came up with this; Before 1990, everyone knew it was a collective right? WTF are these bald faced liars talking about?
"Indeed, the reasonableness on both sides of the debate implies that there is a middle-ground that can be achieved to limit gun violence in the United States, while still allowing for responsible ownership of firearms for hunting, sport shooting, and personal protection."
They're still having trouble making the connections between the Second Amendment's "security of a free state" and sporting goods.
Perhaps South Park's Underpants Gnomes could help.
I couldn't get through it, chocked full of lies, propaganda, and utter nonsense. I wonder where they came up with this; Before 1990, everyone knew it was a collective right? WTF are these bald faced liars talking about?
ReplyDelete"Indeed, the reasonableness on both sides of the debate implies that there is a middle-ground that can be achieved to limit gun violence in the United States, while still allowing for responsible ownership of firearms for hunting, sport shooting, and personal protection."
ReplyDeleteThey're still having trouble making the connections between the Second Amendment's "security of a free state" and sporting goods.
Perhaps South Park's Underpants Gnomes could help.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5ih_TQWqCA
Be sure and focus on DeShaney.
ReplyDelete