In the days of my youth, it was common to assume our leaders, our government, and our institutions ran things with integrity.
But at least since the Tonkin Gulf Incident, the Pentagon's "Five O'Clock Follies", and the Pentagon Papers, that trust has slipped to the point where we almost assume any discrepancy or lack of transparency hides something that won't stand up to inspection in the light of day.
So, was the failure to purge the "test" votes before entering the actual votes an honest mistake? Or was it yet another deliberate attempt by one of our major parties to rig one of their primary elections?
Should we be asking Debbie Wasserman Shultz or Donna Brazile?
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!
"Caesar's wife must be above suspicion"
ReplyDeleteIn the days of my youth, it was common to assume our leaders, our government, and our institutions ran things with integrity.
But at least since the Tonkin Gulf Incident, the Pentagon's "Five O'Clock Follies", and the Pentagon Papers, that trust has slipped to the point where we almost assume any discrepancy or lack of transparency hides something that won't stand up to inspection in the light of day.
So, was the failure to purge the "test" votes before entering the actual votes an honest mistake? Or was it yet another deliberate attempt by one of our major parties to rig one of their primary elections?
Should we be asking Debbie Wasserman Shultz or Donna Brazile?
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!
1: you won't be voting your way out,
ReplyDelete2: if in doubt refer to 1,
3: each revelation of fraud serves to hide and prevent examination of ever deeper perversions of voting procedures and protocols,
4: good luck