When I first heard about the case, I figured that in a rational world, that would be the ONLY count they would have him on. Now that I've reviewed the legal analysis in that article, and the sterling work of their incompetent state legislators to write logically consistent law, I'll be surprised if it isn't thrown out entirely.
When I first heard about the case, I figured that in a rational world, that would be the ONLY count they would have him on. Now that I've reviewed the legal analysis in that article, and the sterling work of their incompetent state legislators to write logically consistent law, I'll be surprised if it isn't thrown out entirely.
ReplyDeleteInnocent
ReplyDelete